Contradictions and Paradoxes in Exodus 12:43

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Exodus 12:43 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Exodus 12:43. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, God told him and Aaron that the special Passover meal was only for certain people and not for strangers or people who were not part of their group. This was to keep the meal special and meaningful for the people it was meant for.

Exodus 12:43: And the LORD said unto Moses and Aaron, This [is] the ordinance of the passover: There shall no stranger eat thereof:

Contradiction with Galatians 3:28

Exodus 12:43 restricts the Passover to Israelites, whereas Galatians 3:28 states that there is neither Jew nor Greek, indicating inclusivity for all believers.

Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Contradiction with Isaiah 56:3

Exodus 12:43 excludes foreigners, but Isaiah 56:3 says that foreigners who join themselves to the Lord should not feel separated from His people.

Isaiah 56:3: Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I [am] a dry tree.

Contradiction with Matthew 28:19

Exodus 12:43 limits participation, whereas Matthew 28:19 commands to make disciples of all nations, implying the inclusion of all in religious practices.

Matthew 28:19: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: [teach...: or, make disciples, or, Christians of all nations]

Contradiction with Acts 17:26

Exodus 12:43 discriminates based on lineage, but Acts 17:26 emphasizes that God made all nations from one blood, suggesting no distinction among believers.

Acts 17:26: And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

Contradiction with Romans 3:29

Exodus 12:43 is exclusive to Israelites, whereas Romans 3:29 questions if God is only the God of Jews, implying He is also the God of Gentiles.

Romans 3:29: [Is he] the God of the Jews only? [is he] not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:

Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35

Exodus 12:43 limits participation, while Acts 10:34-35 shows God does not show partiality but accepts anyone who fears Him and does what is right.

Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14

Exodus 12:43 creates a division between Israelites and others, but Ephesians 2:14 speaks of Christ breaking down the wall of hostility between groups.

Ephesians 2:14: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];

Paradox #1

Exodus 12:43 might raise questions about inclusivity because it discusses restrictions on who can partake in certain religious practices, which can seem inconsistent with the idea of a loving and inclusive God. This might conflict with more inclusive messages found elsewhere in religious texts.

Paradox #2

The potential doctrinal conflict with this verse might arise from the topic of inclusivity versus exclusivity in religious practices. The verse outlines specific rules about who may participate in certain religious observances. This could be seen as contradictory to more inclusive teachings found elsewhere in the Bible that emphasize welcoming all people into religious experiences.

Paradox #3

Exodus 12:43 states that no foreigner is to eat the Passover meal. The potential contradiction or inconsistency might be with other parts of the Bible that discuss inclusion of foreigners. For instance, texts like Isaiah 56:6-7 talk about welcoming foreigners who join themselves to the Lord. This could seem inconsistent because one part restricts while another includes foreigners, suggesting varying attitudes towards outsiders.

Paradox #4

The contradiction in Exodus 12:43 could be seen in the idea of exclusion and discrimination. The verse lays down rules about who is allowed to participate in a significant religious meal. This can be viewed as promoting exclusivity, which might conflict with ideals of inclusivity and equality.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.