Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse states there is neither bond nor free, implying equality in Christ, while Exodus 12:44 distinguishes between the circumcised servant and others for participation in Passover.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
This verse illustrates that God shows no partiality but accepts those from every nation, contradicting the specific requirement for circumcision in Exodus 12:44.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Colossians 3:11
Indicates that there is no distinction between Greek and Jew, which contradicts the division set by a physical sign like circumcision in Exodus 12:44.
Colossians 3:11: Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond [nor] free: but Christ [is] all, and in all.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:18-19
Emphasizes that circumcision is nothing, directly contradicting the requirement for circumcision in Exodus 12:44 as a condition for eating the Passover meal.
1 Corinthians 7:18-19: Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.
Contradiction with Romans 2:28-29
Suggests a redefinition of what it means to be a true Jew, which transcends physical circumcision required in Exodus 12:44.
Romans 2:28-29: For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Paradox #1
Exodus 12:44 may appear inconsistent with the New Testament teaching that faith, rather than physical actions like circumcision, is central to being part of God's people. The need for circumcision in this verse could contrast with later teachings that focus on spiritual belief over physical rites.
Paradox #2
Exodus 12:44 might be seen as inconsistent because it talks about who can participate in eating the Passover meal. On one hand, it allows a foreign servant to take part if they are circumcised, which implies a level of inclusion. Yet, other parts of the Bible have strict rules about excluding non-Israelites from certain religious practices. This can be confusing because it seems to both include and exclude non-Israelites.
Paradox #3
Exodus 12:44 requires that any slave bought with money must be circumcised before they can eat the Passover meal. The moral conflict here could be seen in how the verse accepts the practice of slavery, which is morally contradictory to the ideal of treating all people equally and with dignity. It suggests a different set of rules for slaves, thereby potentially promoting inequality.