Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse states that there is neither Jew nor Greek in Christ, contradicting the significance Exodus 12:48 places on circumcision and becoming like a native of the land.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Acts 15:28-29
These verses show that the apostles did not impose circumcision on Gentile converts, contradicting the requirement in Exodus 12:48 for participation in the Passover.
Acts 15:28-29: For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
Contradiction with Romans 3:29-30
Emphasizes that God is the God of both Jews and Gentiles, suggesting that the distinctions made in Exodus 12:48 are no longer necessary under the new covenant.
Romans 3:29-30: [Is he] the God of the Jews only? [is he] not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14-15
These verses highlight the abolition of the law's divisions between Jews and Gentiles, which contradicts the separations implicit in the requirement of circumcision in Exodus 12:48.
Ephesians 2:14-15: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Paradox #1
Exodus 12:48 could be seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency in the context of inclusivity and exclusivity. It suggests a requirement for participation in certain religious practices, which could be viewed as conflicting with the broader biblical message of universal love and acceptance. By setting conditions, it may appear to contradict the idea that God's love and blessings are available to all people equally, regardless of their background or practices.
Paradox #2
Exodus 12:48 could be seen as having a doctrinal conflict if compared with New Testament teachings about inclusion. In Exodus, there's a requirement for a foreigner to be circumcised to celebrate Passover, emphasizing separation based on religious rituals. In contrast, the New Testament, especially writings by Paul, often emphasizes faith over rituals and includes Gentiles without requiring them to follow all Jewish customs. This could be seen as an inconsistency or shift in how religious inclusion is approached.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in Exodus 12:48 could be related to the broader issue of how foreigners or non-Israelites were treated in ancient Israelite law and tradition. In some parts of the Bible, there are laws and rules that welcome foreigners and encourage their inclusion in religious practices, while in other parts, the Israelites are advised to remain separate from outsiders. This can create a conflict or inconsistency in understanding the level of inclusion or exclusion of non-Israelites within the community.
Paradox #4
Some might argue that the requirement for male circumcision in the verse could conflict with modern views on bodily autonomy and ethics, where permanent physical alterations, especially for religious reasons, are questioned without the individual's consent. Others may point to health debates surrounding the necessity and risks of the procedure.
Paradox #5
Exodus 12:48 talks about rules for foreigners wanting to celebrate Passover. The contradiction might be that it seems to promote inclusivity by allowing outsiders to join, but only if they adhere to specific religious practices, which could be seen as exclusive or coercive. This can create tension between the ideas of welcoming others and imposing conditions on that welcome.