Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus states that he came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it, suggesting a continuation rather than a practice to be observed perpetually.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 6:14
Believers are not under the law but under grace, implying a release from the perpetual obligation described in Exodus 13:10.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Galatians 4:9-10
Paul criticizes returning to religious observance of days and seasons, conflicting with the ongoing observance commanded in Exodus 13:10.
Galatians 4:9-10: But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? [turn ye again: or, turn ye back] [elements: or, rudiments]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
Paul advises against being judged based on religious festivals, suggesting they are a shadow of what is to come, opposing the perpetual observance in Exodus 13:10.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
Declares the old covenant obsolete, which includes the practices like those commanded in Exodus 13:10.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.