Contradictions and Paradoxes in Exodus 14:27

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Exodus 14:27 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Exodus 14:27. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, God helped the Israelites by parting the sea so they could escape from the Egyptians. When Moses stretched out his hand, the sea closed up again and the Egyptians got caught in the water.

Exodus 14:27: And Moses stretched forth his hand over the sea, and the sea returned to his strength when the morning appeared; and the Egyptians fled against it; and the LORD overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea. [overthrew: Heb. shook off]

Contradiction with Matthew 5:44

Contradicts by advocating love for enemies, unlike the destruction of enemies in Exodus 14:27.

Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Contradiction with Luke 6:35

This verse promotes kindness and mercy, conflicting with the severe judgment in Exodus 14:27.

Luke 6:35: But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and [to] the evil.

Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21

Advises feeding and giving drink to enemies, contradicting the act of destruction in Exodus 14:27.

Proverbs 25:21: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:

Contradiction with Romans 12:20

Encourages overcoming evil with good, opposing the military victory in Exodus 14:27.

Romans 12:20: Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.

Contradiction with Ezekiel 33:11

Describes God’s preference for the wicked to repent rather than perish, contrasting with the destruction in Exodus 14:27.

Ezekiel 33:11: Say unto them, [As] I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

Contradiction with James 2:13

Emphasizes mercy triumphing over judgment, differing from the punishment in Exodus 14:27.

James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]

Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:15

Encourages not repaying evil for evil, opposing the retributive act in Exodus 14:27.

1 Thessalonians 5:15: See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men].

Paradox #1

Theological contradictions or inconsistencies related to Exodus 14:27 could arise when comparing this verse to themes of divine mercy in other parts of the Bible. Some may find it challenging to reconcile the depiction of divine action resulting in the destruction of the Egyptians with the image of a compassionate and forgiving God emphasized in scriptures such as the New Testament. This tension might raise questions about the consistency of God's nature across different parts of the Bible.

Paradox #2

The contradiction or conflict in Exodus 14:27 might relate to the depiction of God's actions as both loving and just. The verse describes the destruction of the Egyptian forces, which can be seen as conflicting with the idea of a loving and merciful God. Some might struggle to reconcile the idea of divine compassion with actions that involve punishment or harm. However, interpretations often emphasize God's justice and protection of the oppressed in this context.

Paradox #3

Exodus 14:27 describes an event where the sea returns, drowning the Egyptian forces pursuing the Israelites. A potential historical inconsistency here is the lack of archaeological and Egyptian records confirming such a significant event in Egyptian history. While this story is a crucial part of biblical tradition, the absence of external evidence or records from Egyptian sources can be seen as a discrepancy between the biblical account and historical or archaeological findings.

Paradox #4

Some scientific discussions about this verse relate to the miraculous parting and returning of a large body of water. Scientifically, the explanation for a sea parting and then returning to drown an entire army might seem inconsistent with natural laws as we understand them. This could be seen as a conflict because water does not normally behave in this way under natural conditions without an extraordinary explanation, such as a miracle or an understood natural phenomenon like tides or winds, which might not fully replicate the event as described.

Paradox #5

The contradiction in Exodus 14:27 could be seen in the way it depicts divine justice versus human ethics. Some people might struggle with the idea of God causing harm to people, even if they are enemies or oppressors, as it conflicts with principles of forgiveness and non-violence. This can raise questions about the morality of using power to harm others, even in the pursuit of a just cause.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.