Contradiction with Joshua 23:10
This verse suggests that the Lord fights for Israel, implying continued divine intervention, whereas Exodus 14:30 describes a specific completed act of deliverance.
Joshua 23:10: One man of you shall chase a thousand: for the LORD your God, he [it is] that fighteth for you, as he hath promised you.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 20:4
Here, God's continual presence in battle is emphasized, contrasting with the one-time deliverance of Exodus 14:30.
Deuteronomy 20:4: For the LORD your God [is] he that goeth with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you.
Contradiction with Judges 3:2
Indicates the importance of learning warfare, while Exodus 14:30 showcases a divine victory without Israel fighting.
Judges 3:2: Only that the generations of the children of Israel might know, to teach them war, at the least such as before knew nothing thereof;
Contradiction with Psalm 44:3
Suggests land was gained not by their own sword, conflicting with the idea of divine overthrow as described in Exodus 14:30.
Psalm 44:3: For they got not the land in possession by their own sword, neither did their own arm save them: but thy right hand, and thine arm, and the light of thy countenance, because thou hadst a favour unto them.
Contradiction with Isaiah 31:1
Warns against reliance on horses and chariots, showing different dependency compared to God’s intervention in Exodus 14:30.
Isaiah 31:1: Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help; and stay on horses, and trust in chariots, because [they are] many; and in horsemen, because they are very strong; but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, neither seek the LORD!
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction or conflict in the idea of a compassionate and loving God allowing or causing harm to others. They might wonder how it aligns with the teachings of mercy, forgiveness, and valuing all human life. This could lead to questions about fairness and justice.