Contradiction with Genesis 22:1
Genesis 22:1 describes God testing Abraham, which is a different kind of test focusing on faith and obedience rather than daily provision.
Genesis 22:1: And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, [here] I [am]. [Behold...: Heb. Behold me]
Contradiction with James 1:13
James 1:13 states that God does not tempt anyone, which might be seen as contradictory if "testing" is interpreted similarly to "temptation."
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Luke 4:12
Luke 4:12 implies that one should not put God to the test, which could contrast with the idea of God testing people in Exodus 16:4.
Luke 4:12: And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:11
Matthew 6:11 speaks of asking for daily bread, potentially differing from the idea of receiving bread as a test rather than regular provision.
Matthew 6:11: Give us this day our daily bread.
Paradox #1
Exodus 16:4 mentions God providing manna to the Israelites during their journey in the desert. A contradiction or inconsistency could relate to the lack of archaeological evidence or records outside the Bible that describe this event. Some historical and biblical scholars question if the large-scale feeding of people in the desert, as described, is feasible without supporting evidence. This leads to debates about the literal versus symbolic interpretation of such biblical narratives.
Paradox #2
The contradiction could arise from the idea of testing people's obedience through hardship, which might conflict with the view of a loving and benevolent deity who provides without conditions. Some might find it inconsistent to equate love with testing and imposing challenges.