Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Exodus 19:13 permits violent enforcement, while this verse promotes peacemaking.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Exodus 19:13 uses force to control, while this verse advocates against using swords, implying nonviolence.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with Romans 12:18
Exodus 19:13 involves harsh consequences, while this verse urges living peaceably with all.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Exodus 19:13 implies potential harm for boundary crossing, while this verse instructs to love and do good to enemies.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Hebrews 12:14
Exodus 19:13 allows aggressive deterrents, while this verse encourages peace and holiness.
Hebrews 12:14: Follow peace with all [men], and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:
Paradox #1
Exodus 19:13 might be seen as conflicting with verses that emphasize God's mercy or encourage forgiveness, because it involves strict punishment without mention of repentance or grace. This could be seen as inconsistent with the broader biblical themes of forgiveness and redemption.
Paradox #2
The verse addresses the punishment for approaching Mount Sinai without permission, suggesting a strict boundary set by God. A potential doctrinal conflict might arise when considering themes of God's accessibility and the invitation for people to come to Him, which is more prominent in the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament. While Exodus highlights God's holiness and the need for reverence, later texts emphasize a more direct relationship with God. This could create an apparent tension between the ideas of divine distance and approachability.
Paradox #3
Exodus 19:13 might raise a contradiction due to its command for harsh punishment without trial. This could conflict with modern views on justice, mercy, and due process, where individuals are given a fair opportunity to be heard before being punished.