Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
Peter proclaims that God shows no partiality, but accepts people from every nation, which contrasts with the idea of a singular 'kingdom of priests' and holy nation being established exclusively for Israel in Exodus 19:6.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
In Christ, there is neither Jew nor Greek, suggesting the abolishment of distinct national roles, which contrasts with the specific calling of Israel as a kingdom of priests in Exodus 19:6.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 10:12
Declares no difference between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord is over all, suggesting universal access to God, in contrast with Israel's special status as described in Exodus 19:6.
Romans 10:12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Contradiction with Hosea 1:9
God declares that Israel is not His people, contradicting the statement of Israel being a holy nation and kingdom of priests in Exodus 19:6.
Hosea 1:9: Then said [God], Call his name Loammi: for ye [are] not my people, and I will not be your [God]. [Loammi: that is, Not my people]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:31-32
Speaks of a new covenant, not like the one with the ancestors, indicating a shift away from the exclusive covenant role given in Exodus 19:6.
Jeremiah 31:31-32: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Contradiction with Isaiah 56:3
Foresees foreigners joining themselves to the Lord, which goes beyond the exclusive calling of Israel as God's holy nation in Exodus 19:6.
Isaiah 56:3: Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I [am] a dry tree.
Paradox #1
Exodus 19:6 describes the Israelites as a "kingdom of priests and a holy nation." A potential contradiction might arise when comparing this idea to other parts of the Bible that establish a distinct, hereditary priesthood from the tribe of Levi. Some might see an inconsistency in the idea of an entire nation being described as priests while at the same time maintaining a specific, separate priestly class.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction between the idea in this verse and the notion that certain groups or people are exclusively chosen. While this verse suggests a special role for one group, other parts of the Bible emphasize inclusivity and that all believers are equal and valued. This can create a tension between being "chosen" and the universal aspects of faith.
Paradox #3
Exodus 19:6 talks about the Israelites being a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. The contradiction or inconsistency might be seen in how the Israelites, in later parts of the Bible, are given a specific group of priests (the Levites) rather than all people acting as priests. This could seem inconsistent with the idea that the entire nation is meant to serve as priests.
Paradox #4
Exodus 19:6 could be seen as having a moral conflict because it talks about one nation being chosen as special among all others, which might appear unfair or exclusive. People might wonder why one group is set apart as unique or given a more significant role, potentially leading to feelings of inequality or favoritism.