Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse, "Thou shalt not kill," contradicts Exodus 1:22 as it prohibits the act of killing, whereas Exodus 1:22 commands the death of male infants.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Numbers 35:33
This verse, stating that bloodshed defiles the land and can be atoned only by the blood of the one who shed it, contradicts the command to kill male infants in Exodus 1:22.
Numbers 35:33: So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye [are]: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it. [the land cannot...: Heb. there can be no expiation for the land]
Contradiction with Proverbs 6:16-17
These verses list things the Lord hates, including "hands that shed innocent blood," conflicting with Exodus 1:22, which orders the killing of innocents.
Proverbs 6:16-17: These six [things] doth the LORD hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him: [unto...: Heb. of his soul]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 22:3
This verse instructs to do no wrong or violence to the innocent, contrary to the directive in Exodus 1:22.
Jeremiah 22:3: Thus saith the LORD; Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place.
Paradox #1
Exodus 1:22 describes a command to harm infants, which might conflict with the broader biblical themes of valuing human life and upholding moral righteousness. This could be seen as inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize the protection of the innocent and the sanctity of life.
Paradox #2
Exodus 1:22 could be seen as contradictory or inconsistent when compared to the commandment "Thou shalt not kill" found in other parts of the Bible, such as the Ten Commandments. This is because the verse describes an order for the death of newborn babies, which conflicts with the broader biblical principle of valuing and preserving life.
Paradox #3
Exodus 1:22 describes a decree by Pharaoh to kill Hebrew baby boys. A historical inconsistency could arise when comparing this story to the Egyptian records, which do not mention such an edict. Additionally, the historical timeline of the Jewish presence in Egypt and the nature of their oppression may not align exactly with archaeological or historical evidence from that period. This could create a conflict or inconsistency for those examining the narrative from a historical perspective.
Paradox #4
The main contradiction with Exodus 1:22 lies in the idea of an edict ordering the death of all newborn Hebrew boys by throwing them into the Nile. In historical and scientific terms, there is no archaeological or recorded evidence from Egyptian sources indicating such a mass execution order during the time this event is traditionally placed. Additionally, the logistics and sustainability of such an act on a wide scale raise practical and ethical questions that conflict with known historical records.
Paradox #5
This verse involves a command that leads to harm against innocent newborns, which conflicts with the moral principle that values all human life and protects the innocent. This creates a contradiction with teachings about compassion and protection for the vulnerable.