Contradiction with Exodus 28:42
Exodus 28:42 instructs the use of linen breeches to cover nakedness, which contrasts with the requirement to avoid exposed steps in Exodus 20:26.
Exodus 28:42: And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness; from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach: [their...: Heb. flesh of their nakedness] [reach: Heb. be]
Contradiction with Exodus 20:24
Exodus 20:24 emphasizes building altars of earth or unhewn stone, while Exodus 20:26 cautions against structures leading to exposed nakedness, creating a potential contradiction in altar construction guidelines.
Exodus 20:24: An altar of earth thou shalt make unto me, and shalt sacrifice thereon thy burnt offerings, and thy peace offerings, thy sheep, and thine oxen: in all places where I record my name I will come unto thee, and I will bless thee.
Contradiction with Exodus 39:28-29
Describes the specific garments for priests to cover their nakedness and for glory and beauty, in contrast to the simplicity implied by Exodus 20:26.
Exodus 39:28-29: And a mitre [of] fine linen, and goodly bonnets [of] fine linen, and linen breeches [of] fine twined linen,
Contradiction with Leviticus 6:10
Mentions the garments a priest must wear while performing duties, which suggests organized worship with specific attire, contrasting the simpler altar directives of Exodus 20:26.
Leviticus 6:10: And the priest shall put on his linen garment, and his linen breeches shall he put upon his flesh, and take up the ashes which the fire hath consumed with the burnt offering on the altar, and he shall put them beside the altar.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:6
Provides instructions on how offerings should be eaten, focusing on procedure over the structural considerations outlined in Exodus 20:26 regarding altar steps and exposure.
Leviticus 19:6: It shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow: and if ought remain until the third day, it shall be burnt in the fire.
Contradiction with Numbers 4:6-8
Details intricate coverings for sacred objects, indicating high attention to ceremonial detail which seems at odds with the basic physical considerations of Exodus 20:26.
Numbers 4:6-8: And shall put thereon the covering of badgers' skins, and shall spread over [it] a cloth wholly of blue, and shall put in the staves thereof.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 22:12
Describes making fringes on clothing, adding ceremonial detail which may not align with the straightforward guidance given on altars in Exodus 20:26.
Deuteronomy 22:12: Thou shalt make thee fringes upon the four quarters of thy vesture, wherewith thou coverest [thyself]. [quarters: Heb. wings]
Contradiction with 2 Samuel 6:14-16
Describes King David dancing and exposing himself, seemingly contradicting Exodus 20:26's command to avoid exposure during acts of worship.
2 Samuel 6:14-16: And David danced before the LORD with all [his] might; and David [was] girded with a linen ephod.
Contradiction with Isaiah 47:2-3
Foretells exposure as a sign of shame, contrasting with the preventive measure for inadvertent exposure in Exodus 20:26.
Isaiah 47:2-3: Take the millstones, and grind meal: uncover thy locks, make bare the leg, uncover the thigh, pass over the rivers.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 44:17-18
Instructs priests to wear linen garments to avoid sweating, contrasting Exodus 20:26's concern with steps, reflecting different approaches to maintaining dignity.
Ezekiel 44:17-18: And it shall come to pass, [that] when they enter in at the gates of the inner court, they shall be clothed with linen garments; and no wool shall come upon them, whiles they minister in the gates of the inner court, and within.
Paradox #1
Exodus 20:26 could be seen as conflicting with other parts of the Bible that discuss modesty and appropriate behavior in worship. The instruction in this verse may contrast with other passages that emphasize inner purity and humility over specific outward actions. However, any contradiction might arise from differing cultural contexts or interpretations.
Paradox #2
This verse could have a contradiction when considering modesty and respect in worship settings. It suggests having safeguards to ensure modesty, but it might conflict with the idea of spiritual equality and the focus on the heart rather than physical appearance or attire. This could create tension between external religious practices and the internal spiritual state.