Contradiction with Matthew 19:5
Contradicts Exodus 21:10 by emphasizing the union of two becoming one flesh, which supports monogamy rather than allowing multiple wives.
Matthew 19:5: And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 3:2
Supports the idea of monogamy by stating that a bishop should be the husband of one wife, opposing the allowance for multiple wives in Exodus 21:10.
1 Timothy 3:2: A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; [of good...: or, modest]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:2
Encourages each man to have his own wife and each woman her own husband, underscoring monogamy, which is contrary to the idea of additional wives in Exodus 21:10.
1 Corinthians 7:2: Nevertheless, [to avoid] fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
Contradiction with Genesis 2:24
Highlights the concept of a man leaving his parents to unite with his wife as one flesh, suggesting a singular partnership, contrasting with the permission for multiple wives in Exodus 21:10.
Genesis 2:24: Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Contradiction with Titus 1:6
States that a leader should be blameless and the husband of one wife, reinforcing monogamy and conflicting with the provision for multiple wives in Exodus 21:10.
Titus 1:6: If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.
Paradox #1
Exodus 21:10 might seem inconsistent with modern views on marriage because it talks about a man having more than one wife and how he should treat them. This can conflict with the modern belief in monogamy and equal treatment within marriage, raising questions about fairness and ethical treatment in biblical laws.
Paradox #2
Exodus 21:10 can be seen as contradictory or inconsistent when compared to teachings about monogamy in the New Testament. While this verse allows for a man to take multiple wives under certain conditions, the New Testament often emphasizes one-man-one-woman relationships, such as in 1 Timothy 3:2, which advises church leaders to be the husbands of one wife. This difference might cause confusion about marital practices and expectations across different parts of the Bible.
Paradox #3
Exodus 21:10 presents a potential contradiction or conflict when viewed against modern views on marriage and women's rights. The verse outlines conditions for taking multiple wives, which can conflict with contemporary beliefs in monogamy and gender equality. The idea of polygamy and the rights of women within such arrangements can be at odds with modern ethical perspectives.
Paradox #4
One potential contradiction in Exodus 21:10 may arise from the acceptance of polygamy. In many modern contexts, having multiple spouses is seen as conflicting with views on equality and exclusive marital commitment, which are valued in many cultures today.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or inconsistency might arise when considering the broader context of marriage laws or practices described in different parts of the Bible, such as the expectation of monogamy versus the allowance for multiple marriages or additional wives. These differences can seem inconsistent to modern readers who interpret other sections of biblical text as promoting single partnerships.