Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Exodus 21:14 advocates for taking a life in cases of premeditated murder, whereas Matthew 5:39 teaches to turn the other cheek and resist not evil.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Exodus 21:14 suggests punishment for a wrongdoer, while Matthew 5:44 instructs to love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Exodus 21:14 endorses avenging a wrongful act, whereas Romans 12:17 advises not to repay anyone evil for evil and to live peacefully with everyone.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Exodus 21:14 emphasizes justice through punishment, while James 2:13 highlights mercy over judgment, stating mercy triumphs over judgment.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Paradox #1
Exodus 21:14 could be seen as a contradiction or inconsistency when compared to passages in the Bible that emphasize forgiveness and mercy. While some parts of the Bible stress the importance of forgiving others, this verse prescribes a strict form of justice without offering room for forgiveness. This can appear to conflict with the broader message of grace and redemption found elsewhere in biblical teachings.
Paradox #2
Exodus 21:14 might appear to conflict with the overall biblical message of forgiveness and redemption. This verse prescribes a strict penalty without offering an opportunity for repentance or forgiveness, which can seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize mercy and the possibility of redemption for one's sins through confession and repentance.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding Exodus 21:14 could revolve around differing views on justice and the application of punishment. In ancient contexts, the verse reflects a specific form of justice that might conflict with modern legal principles or ethical views, especially regarding capital punishment for intentional harm. These differences highlight a tension between ancient practices and contemporary interpretations of justice.
Paradox #4
Exodus 21:14 could present a contradiction or inconsistency when compared to other teachings about forgiveness and turning the other cheek. This verse discusses punishment for intentional harm, but elsewhere, the Bible emphasizes forgiveness and mercy. This can seem conflicting, as one part of the scripture advocates for justice and another for forgiveness.