Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Contradicts Exodus 21:18 by advocating for turning the other cheek instead of seeking retribution for injury.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Contradicts Exodus 21:18 by advising against personal vengeance, emphasizing leaving wrath to God rather than seeking restitution for a quarrel.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Contradicts Exodus 21:18 by promoting not repaying evil for evil or insult for insult, in opposition to the implication of seeking compensation for injuries caused by a fight.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22
Contradicts Exodus 21:18 by advising against saying "I will recompense evil," suggesting a departure from the tit-for-tat approach in Exodus.
Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
Contradicts Exodus 21:18 by encouraging believers to not resist an evil person, but rather offer the other cheek, differing from addressing physical altercations legally.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Paradox #1
Exodus 21:18 might seem to conflict with the broader message of forgiveness or turning the other cheek, which is emphasized in parts of the New Testament, like in Jesus' teachings. This Old Testament verse outlines guidelines for when violence occurs, focusing on compensation and justice, which can appear at odds with later messages about forgiveness and not seeking revenge.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in Exodus 21:18 could arise from the regulation of violence between individuals. On one hand, the verse acknowledges conflict and provides guidelines for resolution, but on the other hand, it may be seen as condoning violent behavior by detailing how to address it rather than promoting non-violence or reconciliation. This might seem inconsistent with the broader moral teaching in the scriptures that emphasize peace and forgiveness.