Contradiction with Leviticus 25:39-40
This verse specifies that Israelites must not be sold as slaves and should be treated as hired workers or as residents, contrasting with Exodus 21:2 which allows for Hebrew servants.
Leviticus 25:39-40: And if thy brother [that dwelleth] by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee; thou shalt not compel him to serve as a bondservant: [compel...: Heb. serve thyself with him with the service, etc]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes equality among all individuals in Christ regardless of status, contrasting with Exodus 21:2 which permits servitude.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
This verse advocates for treating others as you would like to be treated, which contradicts the acceptance of servitude in Exodus 21:2.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:21-23
These verses encourage servants to gain their freedom if possible and highlight the concept of being free in Christ, which contrasts with Exodus 21:2's regulation of Hebrew servants.
1 Corinthians 7:21-23: Art thou called [being] a servant? care not for it: but if thou mayest be made free, use [it] rather.
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with Exodus 21:2 is the issue of slavery. The Bible elsewhere promotes themes of freedom, love, and equality among all people. For example, verses in the New Testament, like Galatians 3:28, emphasize that there is no distinction between people in Christ. This creates a conflict because Exodus 21:2 deals with rules about Hebrew slaves, which could seem inconsistent with the broader biblical message about equality and human dignity.
Paradox #2
Exodus 21:2 discusses the rules regarding Hebrew servants, specifically about serving time and freedom. The possible doctrinal inconsistency arises when compared to the general biblical message of freedom and equality. While many passages in the Bible speak of freedom and treating others justly, this verse deals with a system that appears to accept servitude, which can seem in conflict with broader themes of equality and liberation found elsewhere in the scriptures.
Paradox #3
The contradiction related to Exodus 21:2 revolves around the issue of slavery. In modern times, slavery is widely condemned and considered morally wrong. The idea that an ancient text provides rules for slavery can create a conflict for some readers who struggle to reconcile these historical practices with contemporary values. This can lead to debates about the interpretation of such texts and how they should be understood in today’s context.
Paradox #4
This Bible verse discusses the practice of servitude or slavery. From a scientific and modern human rights perspective, this might contradict the idea that all humans have equal rights and freedoms. Today, we understand and value personal freedom and human rights, which conflicts with the practice of owning or controlling another person as described in historical texts.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the acceptance of slavery, which is considered unethical and a violation of human rights in modern societies. While the verse outlines rules for indentured servitude, the very concept of owning another person as property conflicts with contemporary values of equality and freedom.