Contradictions and Paradoxes in Exodus 21:23

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Exodus 21:23 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Exodus 21:23. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, if someone causes harm and a person gets really hurt or dies, then the person who caused the harm should be punished in a way that's as serious as the harm they caused. This means if someone takes a life, they have to give their own life as a punishment.

Exodus 21:23: And if [any] mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,

Contradiction with Matthew 5:38-39

Jesus teaches to turn the other cheek and not to seek an eye for an eye, contradicting the retributive justice in Exodus 21:23.

Matthew 5:38-39: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:

Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19

Paul urges believers not to repay evil with evil and to leave vengeance to God, opposing the idea of personal retribution found in Exodus 21:23.

Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.

Contradiction with Luke 6:27-29

Jesus commands to love enemies and to offer the other cheek, which contradicts the call for equal retribution in Exodus 21:23.

Luke 6:27-29: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,

Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9

Peter advises not to repay evil for evil, contrary to the reciprocal punishment described in Exodus 21:23.

1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.

Paradox #1

Some people might see a conflict between the principle of "eye for an eye" described in that verse and the teachings of forgiveness and turning the other cheek found in the New Testament. While the Old Testament emphasizes justice and retribution, the New Testament, especially through the teachings of Jesus, often emphasizes mercy and forgiveness. This could be viewed as a shift in how justice and interpersonal behavior are approached.

Paradox #2

Exodus 21:23 could be seen as conflicting with the teachings of forgiveness and turning the other cheek found in the New Testament, particularly in the teachings of Jesus, like in Matthew 5:38-39. In Exodus, there is a concept of retributive justice, whereas in the New Testament, the emphasis is on forgiveness and non-retaliation. This presents a contrast between an Old Testament legal principle and New Testament teachings on mercy and forgiveness.

Paradox #3

Exodus 21:23 is part of the biblical law that mentions the principle of "life for life" in cases of injury. A contradiction or inconsistency could arise when comparing this principle with other parts of the Bible that emphasize forgiveness and mercy, such as Jesus' teachings in the New Testament about turning the other cheek and forgiving others. This difference between law and mercy can create a sense of conflict in interpreting the overall message of the Bible.

Paradox #4

The contradiction in this verse may arise from the contrast between the idea of "an eye for an eye" and the teachings of forgiveness and mercy found elsewhere. This principle can be seen as supporting retribution, which might conflict with messages about love and forgiveness in other parts of the Bible.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.