Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse teaches to not resist evil and to turn the other cheek, which contrasts with the restitution and retaliation principle found in Exodus 21:27.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises against seeking personal vengeance, contrary to the principle of seeking compensation for injury in Exodus 21:27.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
These verses encourage showing kindness to enemies, in contrast with the prescriptive model of equitable retribution in Exodus 21:27.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
This verse suggests offering the other cheek, contradicting the action of demanding recompense for harm done as in Exodus 21:27.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
This verse states not to seek revenge or bear a grudge, which contrasts with the retributive justice implied in Exodus 21:27.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Paradox #1
Exodus 21:27 discusses laws about injuries and freeing slaves. A contradiction might arise when comparing it to other parts of the Bible that permit slavery or set different rules for it. Some may question the fairness or consistency in how different rules apply to slaves elsewhere in the text.
Paradox #2
Exodus 21:27 discusses a specific law about compensation for injury. A potential doctrinal conflict might arise when comparing it to the teachings of forgiveness and turning the other cheek as advised in the New Testament, such as in Matthew 5:39. The Old Testament often focuses on justice and restitution, while the New Testament emphasizes forgiveness and non-retaliation. This could lead to differences in interpretation on how to handle wrongs and injuries.
Paradox #3
One potential contradiction in that verse could be the differing treatment of people based on their social status. It might suggest that physical harm to a servant results in their freedom, which may seem to conflict with the broader moral principle of equal value and dignity for all humans, suggesting an inconsistent application of justice.