Contradiction with Matthew 10:31
This verse emphasizes the value of human life over that of animals, whereas Exodus 21:32 places a monetary value on a human's life based on an animal's actions.
Matthew 10:31: Fear ye not therefore, ye are of more value than many sparrows.
Contradiction with Genesis 1:27
This verse highlights the creation of humans in God's image, implying intrinsic value, contrasting with the compensatory approach for human life in Exodus 21:32.
Genesis 1:27: So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Contradiction with Matthew 12:12
It suggests a greater inherent worth of a person over an animal, conflicting with the assessment and valuation approach seen in Exodus 21:32.
Matthew 12:12: How much then is a man better than a sheep? Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the sabbath days.
Contradiction with Luke 12:7
The verse reflects on the immense value and care for each human life, contrasting with the financial settlement for human life presented in Exodus 21:32.
Luke 12:7: But even the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear not therefore: ye are of more value than many sparrows.
Paradox #1
Exodus 21:32 might raise concerns about the value placed on human life, particularly in comparison to other laws in the Bible that emphasize the inherent worth and dignity of every person. This verse discusses a specific scenario that could be perceived as setting a monetary value on human life, which might appear in conflict with the broader biblical teaching of humans being made in the image of God.
Paradox #2
The possible contradiction or conflict with Exodus 21:32 might relate to how the verse addresses the value of a human life, specifically in the context of slavery and compensation. This can be seen as inconsistent with other biblical teachings that emphasize the inherent worth and equality of all human beings.
Paradox #3
Exodus 21:32 might raise contradictions or conflicts due to its approach to valuing human life differently based on social status or ownership, specifically relating to slavery, which conflicts with modern views on equality and human rights. This can cause tension between ancient legal practices and contemporary ethical standards.
Paradox #4
The inconsistency lies in the valuation of human life. The verse assigns a monetary value as compensation for the injury or death of a servant, which may conflict with modern ethical views that believe human life and dignity cannot be quantified.
Paradox #5
Exodus 21:32 can be seen as morally contradictory or inconsistent because it assigns a specific monetary value to a human life, which might contradict modern views on human dignity and equality. This could be seen as conflicting with the idea that every person is invaluable and equal in worth.