Contradiction with Deuteronomy 15:12-15
These verses outline the fair and generous treatment of servants, emphasizing release and provision after six years, which contrasts with the conditional and less benevolent approach in Exodus 21:8.
Deuteronomy 15:12-15: [And] if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse stresses equality among all people in Christ, which contradicts the discrimination implied in the treatment of servants in Exodus 21:8.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with James 2:8-9
The mandate to love your neighbor as yourself and the warning against partiality contrast with the conditional ownership and treatment of servants in Exodus 21:8.
James 2:8-9: If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
The Golden Rule of doing unto others as you would have them do unto you contradicts the servitude conditions and lack of reciprocal fairness in Exodus 21:8.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
This call for love and non-revenge against others stands in opposition to the conditional servitude described in Exodus 21:8, which lacks an emphasis on mutual respect and love.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Paradox #1
Exodus 21:8 may cause issues due to differing views on morality. It deals with treatment of female servants and raises concerns over ethical treatment and equality. Some readers see it as contradicting modern views on human rights and the inherent worth of individuals.
Paradox #2
Exodus 21:8 might seem to have a contradiction regarding the treatment of female servants, compared to other biblical principles emphasizing equality and fairness. This verse can be seen as conflicting with the broader biblical teaching of treating all individuals with dignity and respect.
Paradox #3
Exodus 21:8 might be seen as controversial due to differing views on slavery and women's rights. The verse deals with regulations about selling and treating female slaves, which is at odds with modern values advocating for human rights and equality. This can create a conflict between historical practices and contemporary ethical standards.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction or inconsistency may involve differing views on human rights and gender equality. In modern understanding, all individuals are considered equal and possess inherent rights. This clashes with ancient practices where slavery was accepted, possibly leading to inconsistencies with current ethical and human rights standards.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in Exodus 21:8 could be seen in how it addresses the treatment of female slaves. On the one hand, the Bible advocates for compassion and justice. On the other, this verse discusses selling a female servant, which can seem to conflict with modern ideals of human rights and equality. Thus, the inconsistency arises from historical norms of slavery being at odds with contemporary moral values.