Contradiction with Genesis 34:12
Shechem offers a dowry to marry Dinah after defiling her, contrasting the presumed automatic penalty in Exodus 22:17.
Genesis 34:12: Ask me never so much dowry and gift, and I will give according as ye shall say unto me: but give me the damsel to wife.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 22:28-29
Different consequence for seduction, requiring the man to marry the woman and never divorce her, whereas Exodus 22:17 implies the father's decision.
Deuteronomy 22:28-29: If a man find a damsel [that is] a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 18:25
King Saul demands a bride price of Philistine foreskins for David to marry Michal, illustrating bride price negotiation, compared to Exodus 22:17.
1 Samuel 18:25: And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David, The king desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king's enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines.
Paradox #1
This verse can pose a contradiction because it involves harsh treatment based on gender and marital expectations, which conflicts with contemporary views on gender equality and personal rights. It reflects an ancient legal system that doesn't align with modern moral standards of justice and individual freedom.