Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
These verses indicate that God shows no partiality and accepts people from every nation who fear Him and do what is right, which can be seen as contradicting the exclusionary stance in Exodus 22:19.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Isaiah 56:7
This verse speaks of God's house being a house of prayer for all people, suggesting inclusivity, which could be seen as contrasting with the exclusivity in Exodus 22:19.
Isaiah 56:7: Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices [shall be] accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people.
Contradiction with Matthew 22:39
This commandment to love your neighbor as yourself emphasizes compassion and acceptance, potentially conflicting with the severe exclusion in Exodus 22:19.
Matthew 22:39: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Paradox #1
Exodus 22:19 deals with serious consequences for certain wrongful acts. A potential theological conflict could arise when comparing this verse with the New Testament teachings on forgiveness and redemption through Jesus. While Exodus presents a law-focused, immediate consequence, the New Testament often emphasizes forgiveness and second chances. This difference might seem inconsistent to some readers who are comparing the messages from the Old and New Testaments.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Exodus 22:19 may relate to the concept of bestiality. In a scientific context, bestiality raises biological inconsistencies because humans and animals are different species with distinct reproductive and evolutionary paths, making any natural reproductive or relational compatibility scientifically impossible. Moreover, ethical and legal standards in many societies are informed by these scientific understandings, which inherently contradict the practice.
Paradox #3
This verse might present a contradiction when compared to modern views on punishment and justice. Some people might see the severe penalty as inconsistent with ideas of forgiveness or reform. In today's world, many believe in second chances and rehabilitation rather than harsh punishments. This difference can create a conflict between ancient religious laws and contemporary ethical beliefs.