Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises against resisting evil with violence, in contrast to Exodus 22:2, which allows self-defense to the point of killing a thief.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This encourages letting God take vengeance instead of acting in self-defense, differing from Exodus 22:2, which permits killing a thief if caught.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:29
Advises against repaying evil with evil, whereas Exodus 22:2 permits lethal force in self-defense against a thief.
Proverbs 24:29: Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work.
Paradox #1
Exodus 22:2 discusses the situation involving self-defense against a thief. A potential contradiction arises when comparing this to other biblical teachings like "Thou shalt not kill" and Jesus' teachings on non-violence and loving one's enemies. This could seem inconsistent with the idea of showing mercy and not resorting to violence.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction or inconsistency with the guidance in this verse could be related to differing interpretations of justice and legal systems over time and across cultures. Ancient laws, including those in the Bible, might conflict with modern legal standards regarding self-defense and property rights, leading to debates about their application or relevance today.
Paradox #3
Exodus 22:2 discusses self-defense in the context of a potential burglary situation. The contradiction here could relate to modern legal and ethical standards, which often involve complex considerations of the proportional use of force and intent. Scientific studies on human behavior and conflict resolution might suggest non-violent methods as more effective or morally preferable in many situations, contrasting with the straightforward allowance for defensive actions mentioned in the verse.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Exodus 22:2 could be that it seems to allow for the use of deadly force in self-defense during a burglary, but this might conflict with other teachings in the Bible that emphasize forgiveness and not killing. The inconsistency arises in balancing justice and mercy.