Contradiction with Deuteronomy 4:2
This verse states not to add or take away from God's commands, which contradicts the specificity and addition found in Exodus 22:29 regarding the offering.
Deuteronomy 4:2: Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:31
This verse prohibits the horrific practices of surrounding nations, while Exodus 22:29's implication of offering aligns more closely with such condemned practices.
Deuteronomy 12:31: Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods. [to the: Heb. of the]
Contradiction with Micah 6:7
Suggests God does not delight in human sacrifices, contradicting the apparent requirement in Exodus 22:29 for such offerings.
Micah 6:7: Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, [or] with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn [for] my transgression, the fruit of my body [for] the sin of my soul? [body: Heb. belly]
Contradiction with Hosea 6:6
Emphasizes mercy over sacrifice, which contradicts the obligatory nature of offerings as found in Exodus 22:29.
Hosea 6:6: For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Contradiction with Psalm 51:16-17
Highlights God's preference for a contrite heart over sacrifices, conflicting with the sacrifice-focused command in Exodus 22:29.
Psalm 51:16-17: For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give [it]: thou delightest not in burnt offering. [else...: or, that I should]
Contradiction with Matthew 9:13
Jesus stresses mercy over sacrifice, presenting a contradiction to the sacrificial demands stated in Exodus 22:29.
Matthew 9:13: But go ye and learn what [that] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Contradiction with Acts 15:28-29
Early church decrees against burdening new believers with old laws, which contradicts the obligation of firstborn and tithe offerings mandated in Exodus 22:29.
Acts 15:28-29: For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
Paradox #1
Exodus 22:29 could be seen as having a contradiction because it mentions giving the firstborn. Some people might see this as conflicting with later texts, like those in the New Testament, that emphasize God's opposition to human sacrifice. It might also seem inconsistent with God's character as loving and merciful. However, traditionally, interpretations suggest it refers to dedicating or redeeming the firstborn rather than actual sacrifice. This helps resolve the apparent conflict by maintaining the idea of commitment to God without endorsing harm.
Paradox #2
Exodus 22:29 might raise questions or contradictions when compared with other parts of the Bible that emphasize mercy and compassion. The verse seems to prescribe strict rules or actions that might seem harsh, especially concerning offerings or sacrifices, which might not align with later teachings that emphasize forgiveness and grace. This can create a tension between the idea of following strict laws versus practicing compassion and understanding in faith.
Paradox #3
Exodus 22:29 talks about offering firstborn sons to God, which can conflict with modern ethical and legal standards that protect the rights and well-being of children. Today, sacrificing or harming human beings, especially children, is considered morally and legally unacceptable. This verse may also contradict scientific understandings of human rights and the value of individual life.
Paradox #4
Exodus 22:29 could present a contradiction or conflict because it discusses offering firstborn sons to God, which can be viewed as conflicting with modern ethical views on the sanctity of human life and child rights. It may raise questions about the morality of such demands.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in Exodus 22:29 might be related to differing interpretations of dates and time frames mentioned in different biblical texts. These interpretations can lead to disagreements over specific details like the age at which certain offerings should be made, as these can be interpreted differently across various passages or translations, creating inconsistencies.