Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises not to resist evil and suggests turning the other cheek, which contrasts with Exodus 22:3's approach to dealing with a thief.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
This verse encourages not to repay evil for evil, which contrasts with the element of retribution or permissible action against a thief in Exodus 22:3.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21
Advises feeding your enemy if he is hungry, which contrasts with the notion of reacting with force as implied in Exodus 22:3.
Proverbs 25:21: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
Suggests offering the other cheek if someone strikes you, which is in contrast to the more immediate defensive measure allowed in Exodus 22:3.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Paradox #1
Exodus 22:3 addresses the situation differently than Exodus 21:12-13. While Exodus 22:3 discusses consequences involving theft and self-defense at night, Exodus 21:12-13 focuses on intentional and unintentional killing. This difference might seem inconsistent in terms of how justice is applied in cases of harm or death.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Exodus 22:3 arises when comparing it to the broader teachings of forgiveness and mercy found in other parts of the Bible. This verse seems to allow a harsher consequence for a thief based on timing, which might conflict with the general biblical principle of compassion and restorative justice.