Contradiction with Exodus 21:16
This verse mentions the penalty for man-stealing, which is a separate law concerning theft but doesn't address the restoration principle mentioned in Exodus 22:7.
Exodus 21:16: And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.
Contradiction with Leviticus 6:4-5
These verses prescribe restitution with an additional fifth part for guilt offerings, whereas Exodus 22:7 requires double restoration for theft.
Leviticus 6:4-5: Then it shall be, because he hath sinned, and is guilty, that he shall restore that which he took violently away, or the thing which he hath deceitfully gotten, or that which was delivered him to keep, or the lost thing which he found,
Contradiction with Matthew 5:40
This verse teaches turning the other cheek and giving more than is taken, contrasting the restitution principle outlined in Exodus 22:7.
Matthew 5:40: And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have [thy] cloke also.
Contradiction with Luke 19:8
Zacchaeus offers fourfold restoration voluntarily, exceeding the double restoration requirement set in Exodus 22:7.
Luke 19:8: And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore [him] fourfold.
Paradox #1
Exodus 22:7 discusses what to do if someone steals another person's property. A potential inconsistency might arise when comparing this verse with teachings about forgiveness and turning the other cheek, as found in the New Testament. While Exodus focuses on restitution and justice for property theft, New Testament teachings might emphasize forgiving the wrongdoer instead. This can create tension between upholding justice and practicing forgiveness.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency in this context might arise when comparing this biblical law to other ancient legal codes, such as the Code of Hammurabi. These legal codes often differ in their specific penalties and procedures for similar offenses, reflecting cultural and societal differences of the time. Such differences can lead to debates about the origins and influences of biblical laws.
Paradox #3
Exodus 22:7 deals with rules about the safekeeping of goods. A potential contradiction could arise if one considers the broader Biblical message of forgiveness and compassion. While this verse sets clear rules for accountability and restitution if trust is broken, it may seem inconsistent with other teachings that emphasize forgiveness over strict justice. This could create a conflict between following a rigid rule and showing mercy.