Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:31-32
This verse talks about a new covenant that differs from the old covenant made with the people, indicating a shift away from the covenant mentioned in Exodus 24:7.
Jeremiah 31:31-32: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:6-7
It states that the first covenant had faults, contradicting the complete agreement and willingness expressed by the people in Exodus 24:7.
Hebrews 8:6-7: But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. [covenant: or, testament]
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:9
It implies the removal of the first covenant to establish the second, contrasting with the initial acceptance of the covenant in Exodus 24:7.
Hebrews 10:9: Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:21
It suggests that the law cannot give life, which contradicts the commitment to follow the law made in Exodus 24:7.
Galatians 3:21: [Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Contradiction with Romans 7:6
It mentions being delivered from the law, contradicting the binding agreement made in Exodus 24:7.
Romans 7:6: But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not [in] the oldness of the letter. [that being...: or, being dead to that]
Paradox #1
Exodus 24:7 involves the people agreeing to follow the law, which can seem contradictory to the instances in the Bible where they later disobey those laws. This presents a conflict between their commitment to follow God's commandments and their subsequent actions.
Paradox #2
One potential historical inconsistency related to this verse is the idea that the Israelites received and agreed to the covenant laws all at once, as suggested by the narrative. This seems at odds with other parts of biblical text, where laws and instructions are given over time and in different contexts. It raises questions about how the laws were communicated and accepted in a real historical setting.
Paradox #3
Exodus 24:7 could present a contradiction or conflict because it involves the Israelites agreeing to follow all of God's laws. The inconsistency arises when considering later events where they repeatedly break these laws, highlighting a gap between their promises and actions. This tension reflects the human struggle with committing to and upholding moral and spiritual standards consistently.