Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4
This verse states that it is not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins, contrasting with the blood ritual described in Exodus 29:12 as part of atonement.
Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:11
God questions the value of multiplied sacrifices and burnt offerings, which contradicts the importance given to sacrificial rituals like in Exodus 29:12.
Isaiah 1:11: To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. [he goats: Heb. great he goats]
Paradox #1
Exodus 29:12 involves specific sacrificial rituals, including using blood as part of a religious ceremony. Some people might see a contradiction or conflict in this practice, as the act of animal sacrifice could be viewed as inconsistent with a compassionate or non-violent value system that respects all forms of life. This can raise questions about the morality of taking a life for religious purposes.