Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus states He came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it, which can be seen as a contrast to the continuous sacrificial practices described in Exodus 29:16.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4
Implies sacrifices of animals cannot take away sins, in contrast to the sacrificial instructions in Exodus 29:16.
Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Contradiction with Hosea 6:6
God desires mercy and not sacrifice, contradicting the emphasis on animal sacrifice in Exodus 29:16.
Hosea 6:6: For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Contradiction with Psalm 51:16-17
Indicates that God does not delight in sacrifice, countering the sacrificial requirement described in Exodus 29:16.
Psalm 51:16-17: For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give [it]: thou delightest not in burnt offering. [else...: or, that I should]
Paradox #1
Exodus 29:16 involves sacrificial rituals that can be seen as morally conflicting. While some might view these rituals as a way to show dedication and obedience to God, others could see them as cruel or violent. This creates a conflict between the intention of worship and the act itself, which may seem harsh or unethical to some.