Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse says "Thou shalt not kill," which contradicts Moses' action of slaying an Egyptian in Exodus 2:12.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse instructs to "love your enemies," contrasting with Moses' act of violence against the Egyptian.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises "avenge not yourselves" and "give place unto wrath," conflicting with Moses taking justice into his own hands.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
These verses encourage feeding your enemy if he is hungry, which differs from Moses' action of killing the Egyptian.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
This verse advises "thou shalt not avenge," which contradicts Moses' action where he killed the Egyptian.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Paradox #1
Exodus 2:12 might raise questions about the morality of Moses' actions. Some may find it conflicting that a future leader and prophet would resort to violence, which could seem inconsistent with later teachings that emphasize peace and love. This could be seen as a contradiction between Moses' actions and the moral teachings generally promoted in the Bible.
Paradox #2
Exodus 2:12 involves Moses taking justice into his own hands in a way that could be seen as contradictory to later teachings about justice and non-violence. This act might seem inconsistent with later biblical principles that emphasize legal processes and leaving vengeance to God.
Paradox #3
Exodus 2:12 describes an event where Moses kills an Egyptian, which raises moral and ethical questions. The potential contradiction or conflict arises from Moses being depicted as a righteous leader and prophet in the Bible, yet this action could be seen as morally questionable or inconsistent with later teachings that emphasize peace and forgiveness. This creates a tension between the act of violence and Moses' role as a moral and spiritual guide.
Paradox #4
The potential conflict with Exodus 2:12 could relate to moral or ethical issues in interpreting the act described, rather than a direct contradiction. The verse involves an act of violence, and the ethical implications may conflict with contemporary views on morality and justice. However, there is no direct scientific inconsistency.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could arise from the act of committing violence, even in defense or anger, which conflicts with the broader moral teachings of peace and forgiveness found elsewhere in religious texts.