Contradiction with Joshua 24:19
This verse states that God is a jealous and uncompromising God, suggesting a nature that may not imply compassion or remembrance as seen in Exodus 2:24.
Joshua 24:19: And Joshua said unto the people, Ye cannot serve the LORD: for he [is] an holy God; he [is] a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgressions nor your sins. [holy God: Heb. holy Gods]
Contradiction with Numbers 23:19
This verse states that God does not change His mind, contrasting with the idea of God remembering or acting upon a covenant only after hearing groaning.
Numbers 23:19: God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:15
This verse indicates God can choose to ignore cries for help, contradicting the notion in Exodus 2:24 that He listens and remembers His covenant.
Isaiah 1:15: And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood. [make...: Heb. multiply prayer] [blood: Heb. bloods]
Contradiction with Nahum 1:2
This verse emphasizes God's wrath and vengeance, opposing the compassionate aspect of God's character in Exodus 2:24.
Nahum 1:2: God [is] jealous, and the LORD revengeth; the LORD revengeth, and [is] furious; the LORD will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth [wrath] for his enemies. [God...: or, The LORD is a jealous God, and a revenger, etc] [is furious: Heb. that hath fury]
Paradox #1
Exodus 2:24 speaks about God remembering His covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. A potential contradiction might arise when considering the concept of an omniscient God who supposedly doesn't forget anything. If God is all-knowing, one might wonder why He would need to "remember" something as significant as His covenant. It can be challenging to understand why an all-knowing being would use human-like language or actions, such as remembering. This can appear inconsistent to some, though many interpretations suggest this language is metaphorical, helping humans understand divine actions in a relatable way.
Paradox #2
Exodus 2:24 might present a moral inconsistency in the sense that God responds to the suffering of the Israelites only after hearing their cries, raising questions about why an all-knowing and compassionate deity requires human prompting to act against injustice or suffering. This could lead to a conflict regarding divine omniscience and omnibenevolence.