Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 9:7
This verse suggests giving should be done cheerfully and voluntarily, not as a mandatory act as implied in the tax in Exodus 30:12.
2 Corinthians 9:7: Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, [so let him give]; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver.
Contradiction with Romans 13:8
This verse emphasizes owing nothing but love to others, contrasting with the mandatory tax described in Exodus 30:12.
Romans 13:8: Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:42
This verse encourages giving to anyone who asks, potentially contradicting the idea of only taxing certain individuals as in Exodus 30:12.
Matthew 5:42: Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:10
This verse discusses the curse of relying on the law, contrasting with the law adherence observed in Exodus 30:12.
Galatians 3:10: For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Contradiction with Matthew 17:24-27
This narrative involves Jesus stressing a freedom from traditional taxes, offering a nuanced view compared to Exodus 30:12 tax mandate.
Matthew 17:24-27: And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute [money] came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? [tribute: called in the original, didrachma, being in value fifteen pence sterling; about thirty seven cents]
Paradox #1
Theological contradictions or inconsistencies regarding Exodus 30:12 might revolve around the concept of atonement money and its implications for how God's favor and protection are obtained. Some might find it inconsistent with other teachings that emphasize grace and faith over financial offerings for divine favor. This could raise questions about the nature of God's requirements for mercy and protection.
Paradox #2
Some people might find a conflict with the concept of paying a ransom for one's life as described in this verse. This could seem inconsistent with the idea that life is sacred and cannot be valued in monetary terms. Additionally, it might appear to contradict the New Testament teachings on grace and salvation being free and not earned or paid for.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding the context of Exodus 30:12 might relate to the practice of taking a census in ancient Israel. In some biblical contexts, taking a census is viewed negatively or as an act that brings consequences, such as the one conducted by King David, which led to a plague. Yet, in Exodus 30:12, a census is commanded with specific instructions to avoid a plague, which may seem inconsistent with the negative connotations elsewhere. This could create a conflict in understanding the conditions under which censuses were considered acceptable or not.
Paradox #4
Exodus 30:12 could present a contradiction or inconsistency because it speaks about collecting a ransom for each person's life to avoid a plague when a census is taken. This might conflict with the idea that life is invaluable and sacred, suggesting that a monetary payment can protect or substitute for the value of a person’s life. This could raise questions about the relationship between material wealth and spiritual worth.