Contradictions and Paradoxes in Exodus 30:38

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Exodus 30:38 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Exodus 30:38. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, this verse means that if someone makes a special perfume like the one meant for worship and uses it for themselves, they will no longer be part of their community. It's a way to show how important it is to respect things that are meant for God.

Exodus 30:38: Whosoever shall make like unto that, to smell thereto, shall even be cut off from his people.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:17

This verse suggests that Jesus came to fulfill the law, which could imply a transformation or end of certain Old Testament laws, potentially contradicting the strict prohibition in Exodus 30:38.

Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17

This passage declares that religious rituals are a shadow of things to come, suggesting that strict adherence to Old Testament laws like those in Exodus may no longer be necessary.

Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]

Contradiction with Romans 14:14

This verse highlights the notion of Christian freedom and that nothing is unclean in itself, which may contradict the specific prohibition on the composition in Exodus 30:38.

Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]

Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:23

This verse emphasizes that all things are lawful, though not all things edify, suggesting a context of broader Christian liberty that may conflict with the specific restriction in Exodus 30:38.

1 Corinthians 10:23: All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. [expedient: or, profitable]

Paradox #1

Exodus 30:38 deals with a prohibition against making incense for personal use in a way that mimics the sacred incense used for worshiping God. Some might see a contradiction or inconsistency in this rule if similar substances were used for common or non-religious purposes in ancient times without penalty, thus highlighting potential challenges in distinguishing religious from non-religious uses. The conflict arises if this was hard to enforce or was inconsistently applied, leading to varied interpretations among different groups or over time.

Paradox #2

Exodus 30:38 talks about punishing those who misuse holy incense. The moral conflict here could be about the severity of punishment for what might be seen as a minor offense. In modern terms, it raises questions about the fairness and proportionality of punishment for religious or ritualistic transgressions compared to serious moral wrongs.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.