Contradiction with Exodus 32:14
This verse shows God repenting of the evil he thought to do unto his people, contrasting Moses' plea, which suggests God relenting was a response to Moses' intercession.
Exodus 32:14: And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people.
Contradiction with Numbers 23:19
States that God is not a man that He should repent, contradicting the notion in Exodus 32:11 that implies God may change His mind based on human intercession.
Numbers 23:19: God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
Contradiction with Isaiah 46:10
Declares God's purpose will always stand, contradicting the potential change in action suggested by Moses' intercession in Exodus 32:11.
Isaiah 46:10: Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times [the things] that are not [yet] done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
Contradiction with James 1:17
Describes God as having no variableness or shadow of turning, contrasting with the implication in Exodus 32:11 that God's intentions could be influenced by Moses.
James 1:17: Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Contradiction with Malachi 3:6
Affirms that God does not change, contradicting the implication in Exodus 32:11 that God's course could be altered by Moses' plea.
Malachi 3:6: For I [am] the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.