Contradiction with Romans 2:11
This verse contradicts Exodus 33:19 by stating that there is no respect of persons with God, implying impartiality, whereas Exodus 33:19 speaks of God showing mercy selectively.
Romans 2:11: For there is no respect of persons with God.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34
This verse indicates that God shows no partiality, contradicting Exodus 33:19, which implies God chooses whom to favor.
Acts 10:34: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Galatians 2:6
This verse asserts that God does not accept the person of man, contradicting the notion in Exodus 33:19 of God selectively granting grace.
Galatians 2:6: But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed [to be somewhat] in conference added nothing to me:
Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse emphasizes God's universal love for the world, seemingly contradicting the selective mercy described in Exodus 33:19.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Paradox #1
Exodus 33:19 might seem to contradict the idea of fairness in divine justice. The verse suggests that God shows mercy and favor to whomever He chooses. This could appear inconsistent if you believe that a just God should treat everyone equally. However, many theologians explain this as God's sovereign choice, emphasizing that divine compassion is not something humans can earn or predict.
Paradox #2
Some people might point out a contradiction between this verse and the idea of God's fairness. The verse talks about God choosing whom to be gracious to, which can seem inconsistent with the belief that God treats everyone equally. However, others interpret it as highlighting God's sovereignty and the mystery of divine will, emphasizing that God's ways are beyond human understanding.
Paradox #3
Exodus 33:19 might raise questions or contradictions regarding the idea of divine fairness. In this verse, God declares He will show mercy and compassion to whomever He chooses. This could conflict with the belief that God is always fair and impartial, leading to debates about why some receive mercy and others do not, and how this fits with the concept of justice.
Paradox #4
The concept in the verse suggests that divine favor and mercy are given selectively, based on God's own decision rather than any human action or merit. This might conflict with the scientific principle of cause and effect, where outcomes are typically the result of specific actions or conditions, rather than arbitrary decisions.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in Exodus 33:19 could be seen in the idea that God chooses to show mercy and compassion to some individuals but not to others. This may conflict with the belief in God's fairness or impartiality, as it suggests preferential treatment.