Contradiction with Exodus 23:31-33
Describes the gradual driving out of inhabitants rather than an immediate and total conquest, differing from the annihilate approach in Exodus 34:11.
Exodus 23:31-33: And I will set thy bounds from the Red sea even unto the sea of the Philistines, and from the desert unto the river: for I will deliver the inhabitants of the land into your hand; and thou shalt drive them out before thee.
Contradiction with Numbers 14:9
Emphasizes trusting in God for victory, which contrasts with the command to take ownership through specific actions in Exodus 34:11.
Numbers 14:9: Only rebel not ye against the LORD, neither fear ye the people of the land; for they [are] bread for us: their defence is departed from them, and the LORD [is] with us: fear them not. [defence: Heb. shadow]
Contradiction with Joshua 24:12-13
Details how lands were given not by one's sword or bow, contrasting with the proactive measures of conquest in Exodus 34:11.
Joshua 24:12-13: And I sent the hornet before you, which drave them out from before you, [even] the two kings of the Amorites; [but] not with thy sword, nor with thy bow.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 7:22
Mentions God driving out nations little by little rather than all at once, which contrasts with the immediacy in Exodus 34:11.
Deuteronomy 7:22: And the LORD thy God will put out those nations before thee by little and little: thou mayest not consume them at once, lest the beasts of the field increase upon thee. [put...: Heb. pluck off]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Teaches to love your enemies, a philosophy seemingly at odds with the command to drive out other nations in Exodus 34:11.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Envisions a future of peace and non-violence, contrasting the militaristic instruction of Exodus 34:11.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Paradox #1
Exodus 34:11 talks about God's command to drive out various groups of people from the land. This command can seem to conflict with other biblical teachings that encourage love, peace, and forgiveness. For example, Jesus' teachings in the New Testament emphasize loving one's enemies and turning the other cheek. This can create a tension between the Old Testament's instructions for war and conquest and the New Testament's focus on love and compassion.
Paradox #2
Exodus 34:11 could potentially be seen as conflicting with the Bible's messages on peace and love, like those found in the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament. The verse involves directives towards the conquest of other peoples, which might seem at odds with later messages about loving neighbors and enemies.
Paradox #3
Exodus 34:11 talks about God commanding the Israelites to drive out certain groups from the land as they enter it. A historical inconsistency could arise when compared with archaeological evidence, which often suggests that the Canaanite societies were a continuous presence in the region rather than being entirely removed or destroyed at one time. This difference between the biblical narrative and archaeological findings creates a potential conflict or contradiction in understanding the historical events described in the Bible.
Paradox #4
Exodus 34:11 could be seen as having a contradiction because it mentions the idea of God commanding the Israelites to drive out or conquer other groups of people to take their land. This could conflict with moral values around peaceful coexistence, respect for others' territories, and the idea of not harming others. Some people might see this as inconsistent with teachings of love and compassion found elsewhere in religious texts.