Contradiction with Numbers 15:32-36
These verses narrate the punishment of a man for gathering wood on the Sabbath, reinforcing the prohibition rather than contradicting it.
Numbers 15:32-36: And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day.
Paradox #1
Exodus 35:3, which instructs not to kindle a fire on the Sabbath, could be seen as a contradiction or inconsistency when compared to other parts of the Bible that discuss helping others in need. Some interpret this instruction as overly strict, possibly conflicting with teachings that emphasize mercy and helping others, even on the Sabbath. This tension highlights a debate over strict Sabbath observance versus compassionate actions.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency might arise from the rule about not kindling fire on the Sabbath. This could conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize mercy and necessity, such as situations where lighting a fire might be necessary for warmth or cooking, which could be seen as acts of mercy or basic needs. Some might find tension between strict Sabbath rules and compassionate actions.
Paradox #3
Exodus 35:3 could conflict with the traditional Jewish practice of lighting Shabbat candles, because the verse prohibits kindling fire on the Sabbath, while lighting candles is a Sabbath ritual. This can be seen as inconsistent unless the verse is interpreted differently to allow this practice.
Paradox #4
Exodus 35:3 might show a contradiction or inconsistency because it instructs not to kindle a fire on the Sabbath day, which could conflict with basic needs like cooking or keeping warm. This can seem harsh or impractical in different life situations, suggesting a tension between religious rules and everyday necessities.