Contradiction with Isaiah 45:5
This verse contradicts Exodus 3:14 by emphasizing that there is no other god besides the LORD, whereas Exodus 3:14 identifies God specifically as "I AM," highlighting a personal identity rather than exclusivity.
Isaiah 45:5: I [am] the LORD, and [there is] none else, [there is] no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:
Contradiction with John 1:18
John speaks of God’s invisibility, while Exodus 3:14 implies God is present and knowable through the name "I AM."
John 1:18: No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him].
Contradiction with John 8:58
This verse conflicts with Exodus 3:14 because Jesus applies the term "I AM" to Himself, which causes theological debate about the identity and nature of God.
John 8:58: Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:8
While Exodus 3:14 establishes God as "I AM" in the present, Hebrews 13:8 presents the view of Jesus Christ, as eternally unchanging in the past, present, and future, creating a temporal contradiction.
Hebrews 13:8: Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Paradox #1
Exodus 3:14 presents a theological concept that God is self-existent and eternal by stating a name for God that reflects this idea. Some people might see a contradiction or inconsistency when comparing this with other parts of the Bible that describe God using more personal or anthropomorphic traits. These different depictions can seem conflicting, as one emphasizes God's transcendence and the other emphasizes His personal, relatable aspects. However, many theologians argue that these differences highlight the complexity of God rather than present a true contradiction.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency with Exodus 3:14 might involve differing interpretations of God's nature or identity. Some traditions emphasize the verse to highlight God's self-existence and transcendence, while others focus on the relational aspects of God. This could lead to debates on whether God's nature is more about being beyond human understanding versus being personal and relational.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict with Exodus 3:14 might arise from the different interpretations and translations of the Hebrew phrase "Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh." Some interpret it as "I Am That I Am," while others suggest variations like "I Will Be What I Will Be." This leads to debates about its true meaning and implications for understanding the nature of God. Also, different religious traditions might emphasize or interpret this phrase differently, leading to varying theological conclusions.