Contradiction with Exodus 20:15
This verse states, "Thou shalt not steal," which contradicts the concept of taking valuables from the Egyptians, as instructed in Exodus 3:22.
Exodus 20:15: Thou shalt not steal.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:42
This verse encourages giving to those who ask, contrasting with taking possessions from the Egyptians.
Matthew 5:42: Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Contradiction with Romans 13:9
This verse reiterates the commandment not to steal, conflicting with the actions described in Exodus 3:22.
Romans 13:9: For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:11
This passage instructs not to steal, aligning against the directive in Exodus 3:22.
Leviticus 19:11: Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another.
Paradox #1
The verse might suggest a moral issue because it involves taking items from the Egyptians, which can be seen as conflicting with the commandment against stealing. Some might see this as inconsistent with the overall ethical teachings of the Bible.
Paradox #2
Exodus 3:22 could be seen as potentially conflicting with teachings on honesty and not stealing, as the verse involves taking valuable items from Egyptians. This might be viewed as conflicting with commandments against stealing, even though it is framed within the context of divine instruction.
Paradox #3
Some people see a contradiction in Exodus 3:22 when compared to moral teachings about not stealing or coveting. In this verse, the Israelites are instructed to take items from the Egyptians, which could be seen as conflicting with later commandments against stealing. This raises questions about morality and ethics in different contexts within the biblical narrative.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in that verse relates to the concept of fairness or ethics rather than a direct scientific issue. The verse implies taking valuable items from the Egyptians without a clear mutual agreement or consent. This action could be seen as conflicting with moral principles about ownership and consent, which can be analyzed from ethical or philosophical perspectives rather than scientific ones.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in Exodus 3:22 could be seen in the context of taking valuable items from the Egyptians, which might conflict with the moral principle of not stealing. Some might struggle with the idea of God instructing people to take items from others, even if it is in the context of liberation from slavery.