Contradiction with James 1:13
This verse states that God does not tempt anyone, contradicting Exodus 4:11 where God takes responsibility for giving people disabilities or impairments.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
Here, God is described as love, which seems opposite to the idea of God deliberately causing suffering as suggested in Exodus 4:11.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
This verse speaks of God's plans for welfare and not for evil, which contradicts the implication in Exodus 4:11 that God causes physical impairments.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with Genesis 1:31
God saw everything that He made and it was very good, which appears to contradict the idea that God creates imperfections as suggested in Exodus 4:11.
Genesis 1:31: And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, [it was] very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. [And the evening...: Heb. And the evening was, and the morning was etc.]
Paradox #1
Exodus 4:11 may raise questions about human free will versus divine control. The verse implies that God has control over human abilities, which could conflict with the idea that individuals have full autonomy over their actions and characteristics. This tension between divine sovereignty and human freedom is a common topic in theological discussions.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction with Exodus 4:11 is related to human free will versus divine control. The verse suggests that God has power over human abilities and conditions, which might seem to conflict with the idea that humans have free will and responsibility for their own actions. Some people find it challenging to understand how God can control everything and yet humans are still free to make their own choices.
Paradox #3
Exodus 4:11 presents God as the one who gives people their abilities, such as speech. A potential contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing this to other parts of the Bible where human ailments or conditions are attributed to natural causes or human sin, rather than directly to God. This can lead to differing interpretations about who or what is responsible for human abilities and disabilities.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Exodus 4:11 might be related to the idea that natural human conditions, like being able to speak or being unable to speak, are directly controlled or determined by a divine being. Science would argue that these conditions are usually the result of biological and environmental factors rather than the direct will of a deity.
Paradox #5
The contradiction could be that if God controls human abilities and disabilities, it may raise questions about the fairness of individuals being born with disabilities or suffering from them. This could lead to a conflict between the belief in a benevolent deity and the existence of suffering or imperfection in the world.