Contradiction with Matthew 6:7
This verse advises against using vain repetitions in prayer, whereas Exodus 8:9 involves a specific request being made, which can be interpreted as a form of repetition in petition.
Matthew 6:7: But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen [do]: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8-9
This verse suggests that God's ways and thoughts are higher than human understanding, which could be seen as contradicting Exodus 8:9, where Moses gives Pharaoh the power to decide when to remove the frogs, implying human influence on divine action.
Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Job 21:15
This verse questions the value of serving or praying to God and implies that it has no effect, while Exodus 8:9 shows a clear instance where a request to God (through Moses) is met with a responsive action.
Job 21:15: What [is] the Almighty, that we should serve him? and what profit should we have, if we pray unto him?
Contradiction with Jeremiah 7:16
This verse shows God telling Jeremiah not to pray for certain people because He will not listen, whereas in Exodus 8:9, God listens and acts upon the request that is conveyed through prayer.
Jeremiah 7:16: Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to me: for I will not hear thee.
Contradiction with James 4:3
This verse indicates that prayers are not answered when they are asked with the wrong motives, which seems to contradict Exodus 8:9, as Pharaoh's request (through Moses' question) is honored even though his motives are arguably self-centered.
James 4:3: Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume [it] upon your lusts. [lusts: or, pleasures]
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Exodus 8:9 could be seen as the imbalance of power and fairness. Moses gives Pharaoh a choice regarding the timing of ending a plague, suggesting cooperation. However, it raises the question of why Pharaoh has a say in ending suffering when he caused it, highlighting a possible inconsistency in justice and fairness.