Contradiction with Exodus 9:31
Contradicts Exodus 9:32 by claiming that the flax and the barley were destroyed, whereas Exodus 9:32 states that the wheat and the rye were not destroyed.
Exodus 9:31: And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley [was] in the ear, and the flax [was] bolled.
Paradox #1
Exodus 9:32 might appear inconsistent with earlier verses because it mentions that the wheat and spelt crops were not destroyed by the hail, whereas an earlier verse mentions that it destroyed every plant in the fields. This could seem contradictory regarding what was actually destroyed by the hail.