Contradiction with Genesis 18:32
In Genesis, God agrees to spare Sodom if ten righteous people are found, while Ezekiel 14:16 suggests even righteous people cannot save the land.
Genesis 18:32: And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy [it] for ten's sake.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 15:1
God tells Jeremiah even if Moses and Samuel stood before Him, His mind would not be toward the people, similar to Ezekiel 14:16, but different in that extra figures are mentioned.
Jeremiah 15:1: Then said the LORD unto me, Though Moses and Samuel stood before me, [yet] my mind [could] not [be] toward this people: cast [them] out of my sight, and let them go forth.
Contradiction with Exodus 32:14
God changes His mind about destroying His people after Moses intercedes, contrasting with Ezekiel 14:16, where the presence of righteous individuals does not avert judgment.
Exodus 32:14: And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people.
Contradiction with Jonah 3:10
God spares Nineveh after the people repent, showing that collective repentance can lead to salvation, contrasting with Ezekiel 14:16's idea that righteousness of a few does not save the many.
Jonah 3:10: And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did [it] not.
Contradiction with Numbers 16:46-48
Aaron's atonement stops a plague among the Israelites, implying intercession can work, which contradicts Ezekiel 14:16 where such intercession does not prevent judgment.
Numbers 16:46-48: And Moses said unto Aaron, Take a censer, and put fire therein from off the altar, and put on incense, and go quickly unto the congregation, and make an atonement for them: for there is wrath gone out from the LORD; the plague is begun.
Paradox #1
This verse suggests that the presence of righteous individuals cannot save others from consequences or judgment. A contradiction might arise when considering the belief in collective responsibility or the power of good individuals to positively influence or protect a community. It challenges the idea that the righteous can shield others through their virtue.