Contradictions and Paradoxes in Ezekiel 16:21

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Ezekiel 16:21 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Ezekiel 16:21. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Ezekiel, God is upset because the people have done something really bad by hurting and sacrificing children in fire as if it was a way to worship. God wants them to know that this is very wrong and not what He wants at all.

Ezekiel 16:21: That thou hast slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through [the fire] for them?

Contradiction with Matthew 19:14

This verse emphasizes bringing children to God and values their innocence, contrasting with the condemnation in Ezekiel 16:21 of giving children to false idols.

Matthew 19:14: But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.

Contradiction with Psalm 127:3

This verse speaks of children as a heritage and reward from the Lord, contradicting the disregard for children's value implied by sacrificing them in Ezekiel 16:21.

Psalm 127:3: Lo, children [are] an heritage of the LORD: [and] the fruit of the womb [is his] reward.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 6:7

This verse commands teaching children about God diligently, which contrasts with the act of giving them up to idols as mentioned in Ezekiel 16:21.

Deuteronomy 6:7: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. [teach: Heb. whet, or, sharpen]

Paradox #1

The contradiction in Ezekiel 16:21 could be the severe criticism of Israel's actions, which include sacrificing their children. Some might see a conflict with the overall biblical theme of a compassionate and forgiving God. This tension can arise when comparing acts of judgment and punishment with teachings about mercy and forgiveness.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information provided.