Contradiction with James 4:8
This verse encourages drawing near to God and purifying one's heart, as opposed to the actions described in Ezekiel 16:25.
James 4:8: Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse [your] hands, [ye] sinners; and purify [your] hearts, [ye] double minded.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:19
Speaks of the body as a temple and implies it should not be defiled, opposite to the actions in Ezekiel 16:25.
1 Corinthians 6:19: What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost [which is] in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 4:3
Calls for abstaining from fornication, contrary to the promiscuity mentioned in Ezekiel 16:25.
1 Thessalonians 4:3: For this is the will of God, [even] your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication:
Contradiction with Romans 12:1
Advises presenting one's body as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, unlike the profane acts in Ezekiel 16:25.
Romans 12:1: I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, [which is] your reasonable service.
Contradiction with Proverbs 5:3-5
Warns about the deceitful and destructive nature of adultery, which is similar to the behavior critiqued in Ezekiel 16:25.
Proverbs 5:3-5: For the lips of a strange woman drop [as] an honeycomb, and her mouth [is] smoother than oil: [mouth: Heb. palate]
Paradox #1
The verse emphasizes behavior that is considered morally wrong from a divine perspective. A perceived inconsistency might arise when comparing this message to other parts of the scripture that emphasize forgiveness and redemption. It might seem contradictory to portray harsh judgment while also teaching about forgiving transgressions when one repents.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Ezekiel 16:25 might involve differing interpretations about judgment and mercy. Some readers might see a conflict between the harsh judgment described and the message of forgiveness found in other parts of the Bible. This apparent inconsistency can be reconciled by understanding the context and purpose of prophetic warnings alongside the broader biblical themes of repentance and redemption.
Paradox #3
Ezekiel 16:25 includes language that describes immoral behavior in a metaphorical context. A potential contradiction or conflict arises because the passage uses provocative imagery to criticize certain behaviors, which might be seen as inconsistent with other teachings about compassion and forgiveness. The tension lies in the harshness of the metaphorical rebuke compared to messages of mercy and understanding found elsewhere.