Contradiction with James 4:4
This verse calls friendship with the world as spiritual adultery, implying that unfaithfulness is broader than literal adultery, whereas Ezekiel 16:32 focuses on the literal sense.
James 4:4: Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:14
It directly forbids adultery in the Ten Commandments, while Ezekiel 16:32 uses adultery metaphorically to depict unfaithfulness to God.
Exodus 20:14: Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:32
Jesus explains adultery in the context of divorce and marriage, which contrasts with the metaphorical use in Ezekiel 16:32.
Matthew 5:32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:18
Advises to flee from fornication, focusing on physical immorality, unlike the metaphorical representation in Ezekiel 16:32.
1 Corinthians 6:18: Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
Contradiction with Proverbs 6:32
Emphasizes the personal harm and lack of understanding in committing adultery, contrasting with the communal unfaithfulness theme in Ezekiel 16:32.
Proverbs 6:32: [But] whoso committeth adultery with a woman lacketh understanding: he [that] doeth it destroyeth his own soul. [understanding: Heb. heart]
Contradiction with Hosea 3:1
Demonstrates Hosea’s love for an adulterous woman as a representation of God's love for Israel, whereas Ezekiel 16:32 portrays Israel’s actions as degraded.
Hosea 3:1: Then said the LORD unto me, Go yet, love a woman beloved of [her] friend, yet an adulteress, according to the love of the LORD toward the children of Israel, who look to other gods, and love flagons of wine. [of wine: Heb. of grapes]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:28
Speaks about adultery starting in the heart, highlighting personal intent, contrasting with the communal portrayal of unfaithfulness in Ezekiel 16:32.
Matthew 5:28: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
Paradox #1
Historical Contradiction, Inconsistency, or Conflict could arise from the cultural or societal views on marriage and adultery during the time. The verse uses a metaphor that might not align well with historical or cultural perspectives on relationships and faithfulness. Understanding this requires knowledge of the historical context and symbolism which may not directly correlate with modern interpretations.
Paradox #2
Ezekiel 16:32 refers to unfaithfulness with a harsh metaphor. The contradiction might arise from the judgmental language used, which seems at odds with messages of forgiveness and compassion found elsewhere in religious teachings. This harshness may conflict with the idea of offering understanding and second chances.