Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse instructs not to judge others, whereas Ezekiel 16:46 makes a judgment comparing Jerusalem to Samaria and Sodom.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:5
This verse advises to look at one's own faults first before pointing out others', contrasting Ezekiel 16:46's focus on the sins of others.
Matthew 7:5: Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Contradiction with Luke 6:37
Advises against condemnation of others, conflicting with the comparison and implied condemnation in Ezekiel 16:46.
Luke 6:37: Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:
Contradiction with James 4:12
States there is only one lawgiver and judge, which contradicts the judgment expressed in Ezekiel 16:46.
James 4:12: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 16:46 is sometimes seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency because it compares Jerusalem to Sodom and Samaria as "sisters" in terms of moral corruption, while other parts of the Bible suggest that these cities had distinctly different sins and reputations. This can create confusion about the nature and severity of Jerusalem's sins relative to these other cities.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency in Ezekiel 16:46 involves the comparison of Samaria and Sodom as metaphorical sisters to Jerusalem. Historically, both Samaria and Jerusalem were prominent cities of Israel and Judah, respectively. However, Sodom was from an earlier period and a different setting altogether, famously associated with its destruction in the time of Abraham. The inconsistency arises in using Sodom symbolically alongside Samaria to describe relationships that wouldn't naturally fit together chronologically or geographically.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in Ezekiel 16:46 might arise from the comparison being made and the negative portrayal of certain cities. This could be seen as problematic because it involves harsh judgment and condemnation, which could conflict with principles of forgiveness and compassion.