Contradiction with Genesis 3:19
Ezekiel 16:7 speaks of beauty and growth, while Genesis 3:19 reflects on the return to dust and mortality.
Genesis 3:19: In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou [art], and unto dust shalt thou return.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 3:20
While Ezekiel 16:7 highlights flourishing and life, Ecclesiastes 3:20 mentions that all return to dust, emphasizing mortality.
Ecclesiastes 3:20: All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:28-29
Ezekiel 16:7 describes natural beauty and adornment, whereas Matthew 6:28-29 highlights how even Solomon's splendor doesn't compare to the lilies, focusing on divine provision rather than human beauty.
Matthew 6:28-29: And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
Contradiction with Job 14:1-2
Ezekiel 16:7 discusses thriving, in contrast, Job 14:1-2 mentions life as brief and full of trouble, withering like a flower.
Job 14:1-2: Man [that is] born of a woman [is] of few days, and full of trouble. [few...: Heb. short of days]
Contradiction with Isaiah 40:6-7
Ezekiel 16:7 speaks of spreading like a plant, while Isaiah 40:6-7 emphasizes the fleeting nature of human life akin to grass that withers.
Isaiah 40:6-7: The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh [is] grass, and all the goodliness thereof [is] as the flower of the field: