Contradiction with Numbers 14:30
The Israelites who doubted God were told they would not see the promised land, unlike the promise of the land in Ezekiel 20:6.
Numbers 14:30: Doubtless ye shall not come into the land, [concerning] which I sware to make you dwell therein, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. [sware: Heb. lifted up my hand]
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 28:64-65
This passage speaks of dispersion and lack of rest, contrasting with the promise of a land flowing with milk and honey in Ezekiel 20:6.
Deuteronomy 28:64-65: And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, [even] wood and stone.
Contradiction with Judges 2:21-22
God says He will no longer drive out nations before Israel, which goes against the idea of giving them the best land.
Judges 2:21-22: I also will not henceforth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died:
Contradiction with Psalm 95:10-11
God declares an oath that the disobedient would not enter His rest, opposing the promise in Ezekiel 20:6.
Psalm 95:10-11: Forty years long was I grieved with [this] generation, and said, It [is] a people that do err in their heart, and they have not known my ways:
Contradiction with Jeremiah 15:1-2
Here, God expresses His intent to not favor the people despite previous promises, conflicting with the abundant promise in Ezekiel 20:6.
Jeremiah 15:1-2: Then said the LORD unto me, Though Moses and Samuel stood before me, [yet] my mind [could] not [be] toward this people: cast [them] out of my sight, and let them go forth.
Contradiction with Lamentations 5:2
Lamentations describes the land as taken over by strangers, contrasting with Ezekiel 20:6’s promise of land possession.
Lamentations 5:2: Our inheritance is turned to strangers, our houses to aliens.
Contradiction with Amos 5:16-17
This passage speaks of wailing and mourning in all the lands of Israel, contradicting the prosperous land promise.
Amos 5:16-17: Therefore the LORD, the God of hosts, the Lord, saith thus; Wailing [shall be] in all streets; and they shall say in all the highways, Alas! alas! and they shall call the husbandman to mourning, and such as are skilful of lamentation to wailing.
Paradox #1
The theological conflict in Ezekiel 20:6 could be about God promising to bring the Israelites to a land flowing with milk and honey, which some might see as inconsistent with the suffering and challenges they faced in their journey and occupation of the land. This could raise questions about the nature of God's promises and the expectations versus the reality of the Israelites' experience.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Ezekiel 20:6 involves the description of God promising to bring the Israelites to a land flowing with milk and honey. Some critics point out that this idealized depiction of the land does not always match historical and archaeological evidence of the region during the time traditionally associated with the Exodus. Additionally, there can be inconsistencies with the account of how the Israelites came to possess the land, as different biblical texts offer varying narratives and timelines.
Paradox #3
The potential scientific inconsistency with Ezekiel 20:6 could be the description of a land overflowing with milk and honey, which suggests an abundant and fertile environment. Historically, the regions described in the Bible, like Canaan, have varied in terms of fertility and resources, not always matching the abundance implied by the passage. Moreover, this kind of description might not align with archaeological and environmental evidence about the area's resources during that time period.
Paradox #4
Ezekiel 20:6 mentions God promising to bring the Israelites into a prosperous land. A possible contradiction might be seen if one considers the promise against the historical suffering and challenges faced by the Israelites, which could seem inconsistent with the idea of a divinely guaranteed prosperous life. This tension could raise questions about the nature of divine promises and their fulfillment in real-world experiences.