Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
This verse presents Jesus' assertion that he came to fulfill the law, not to abolish it, which contrasts with the criticism of the priests not maintaining the law in Ezekiel 22:26.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 10:4
States that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness, potentially contradicting the enforcement of the law emphasized in Ezekiel 22:26.
Romans 10:4: For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This emphasizes equality before Christ, differing from the strict distinctions and separations between holy and profane mentioned in Ezekiel 22:26.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:6-7
Underlines a new and better covenant through Jesus, which suggests a shift from the old laws upheld in Ezekiel 22:26.
Hebrews 8:6-7: But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. [covenant: or, testament]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
Advises not to let anyone judge you by old regulations about holy days, contrasting the neglect of holiness in Ezekiel 22:26.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 22:26 highlights criticism against priests for failing to teach the difference between holy and unholy, and between clean and unclean. This could conflict with the idea of consistent divine guidance present in the Bible. If priests fail in their duties, it raises questions about how God's message is delivered and upheld consistently.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict could arise because some people might see a difference between the religious practices and laws described in this verse and what was happening historically at the time. Religious leaders were not following the laws or teaching them properly, which some see as inconsistent with the intended role of those leaders.
Paradox #3
Ezekiel 22:26 points out the failings of religious leaders who do not properly distinguish between holy and common things or teach the people the difference between clean and unclean. The contradiction could arise in how religious leaders may still fail in similar ways today, promoting a selective teaching that ignores certain aspects of their faith's requirements or simultaneously condemning actions they themselves practice. This inconsistency can lead to confusion or mistrust among followers.