Contradiction with Isaiah 14:27
This verse highlights the certainty of God's plans and purposes, which seems contrary to the unfulfilled prophecy in Ezekiel 26:12 regarding Tyre's destruction.
Isaiah 14:27: For the LORD of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul [it]? and his hand [is] stretched out, and who shall turn it back?
Contradiction with Jeremiah 18:7-8
This passage indicates that God may change His mind about bringing disaster if people repent, contrasting with the definitive destruction promised in Ezekiel 26:12.
Jeremiah 18:7-8: [At what] instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy [it];
Contradiction with Jonah 3:10
God's decision to not destroy Nineveh after they repented contradicts the irrevocable destruction prophesied for Tyre in Ezekiel 26:12.
Jonah 3:10: And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did [it] not.
Contradiction with Matthew 24:35
The assurance of God's word never failing contrasts with the historical challenges in the complete fulfillment of Ezekiel 26:12 regarding Tyre.
Matthew 24:35: Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
Paradox #1
Ezekiel 26:12 describes a prophecy about the destruction of Tyre. Some people see a contradiction because historical records suggest that Tyre wasn't destroyed exactly as described, particularly by Nebuchadnezzar, who is often linked to this prophecy. Critics argue this creates a conflict between prophecy and historical events.
Paradox #2
The contradiction lies in the prophecy about the destruction of the city of Tyre. According to historical records, while Tyre was besieged and partially destroyed multiple times, it was not completely destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar as suggested in the prophecy. The city continued to exist and thrive afterward, which is inconsistent with the complete destruction implied.
Paradox #3
The contradiction here relates to historical and archaeological evidence. The verse predicts the complete destruction of the city of Tyre, including its stones, timber, and soil being thrown into the sea. However, historical records and archaeological findings indicate that Tyre continued to exist and was inhabited long after the described events, contradicting the total destruction implied in the verse.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict with the message in Ezekiel 26:12 might stem from the discrepancy between the actions described and the teachings of compassion or forgiveness found elsewhere in the Bible. Some might see a tension between destructive actions and the broader biblical call for peace and love.